Not much on the end of the Editor of Perspectives over here.
There have been a lot of rising tensions over the immigration debate, especially over the fact that the President essentially tried to sneak some major amnesty under our noses with a completely dishonest speech. What does this mean for public confidence in the Republican party? I think it pretty much killed it.
New projections: Republicans lose BOTH the House and the Senate, albeit barely. McCain still projected over Hilary. Republicans would actually be better off if Bush were impeached at this point.
Also, the public seems to actually be on the Republican's side with the wire-tapping/phone-tapping and CIA nomination... does that mean that we've changed from our pre-9/11 mindset? I'm a little unsure what to make of it.
Be sure to stay tuned this weekend for some good quality blogs!
Eric Drzewiecki is a recent graduate from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay. He has a bachelor's degree in Political Science, as well as Public Administration. He can be reached at eric_drz@hotmail.com
There have been a lot of rising tensions over the immigration debate, especially over the fact that the President essentially tried to sneak some major amnesty under our noses with a completely dishonest speech. What does this mean for public confidence in the Republican party? I think it pretty much killed it.
New projections: Republicans lose BOTH the House and the Senate, albeit barely. McCain still projected over Hilary. Republicans would actually be better off if Bush were impeached at this point.
Also, the public seems to actually be on the Republican's side with the wire-tapping/phone-tapping and CIA nomination... does that mean that we've changed from our pre-9/11 mindset? I'm a little unsure what to make of it.
Be sure to stay tuned this weekend for some good quality blogs!
Eric Drzewiecki is a recent graduate from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay. He has a bachelor's degree in Political Science, as well as Public Administration. He can be reached at eric_drz@hotmail.com
2 Comments:
Well, consider that the "bad intel" was agreed upon by the rest of the world's intel as well... so I'm not sure that anyone was trying to "sell the public" knowingly with bad intel.
Hmmm, interesting Delusions of Grandeur.
Remember Russ Feingold and his words?
The very fact that he had to say that Democrats should be 'especially clear that we understand the post-9/11 world' is an admission that they don't take the post-9/11 world seriously -- and thus can't be trusted with national security. Don't get me wrong, it seems as of late the R's aren't any better...
Post a Comment
<< Home